_uacct="UA-10813893-1";
urchinTracker();
We want pharmacologically active agents to be available, specifically for cases where risks of a disease greatly outweigh risks posed by a treatment agent. That's why physicians can prescribe chemotherapeutic agents against cancer, even though the agents infrequently may also cause cancers. It's why they can prescribe immunizations, even though the vaccines infrequently may also cause adverse, including lethal, effects.
The death from suicide, even of one patient taking Singulair, is tragic, and illustrates a painful quandary: when to use (or not use) a medication that might prevent 10 or 100 or 1000 times the number of deaths that it causes. If properly prescribed, each medicine added to our arsenal of disease fighting agents contributes to public health, even though it infrequently might also exert adverse effects on an individual's health. I don't claim to know the way out of this quandary, but I do think that media coverage should be balanced by reporting both sides of the benefit-cost analysis. Medications are licensed for prescription use only, not because they are without risk, but because their proper use can mitigate enormously greater risks.
Copyright © 2009 by The Center for Health Risk Assessment and Management, a Division of RAM TRAC Corporation